Tonight I skipped Pilates class to attend the nationwide premier showing of the documentary film My Run, directed by Tim VandeSteeg, which tells the story of Terry Hitchcock, a widower who decided to run from Minnesota to Georgia to raise awareness about the plight of single parents even though he had health problems, had never been a runner, and looked more like St. Nick than Scott Jurek. Hitchcock describes his run as 75 consecutive marathons, though in reality he ran 75 back-to-back ultras, since a typical day involved 27 to 30 miles of running–a distance that took his support crew half an hour to traverse in a car, but took him eight hours of painful run/walking.
Terry was woefully undertrained. Before the kickoff of this endurance stunt, he had never run further than 12 miles in one go, was on blood pressure medication, and carried around a pot belly (which never melted away the entire 75 days he spent on the road). A funny scene tells us that he was the annual last place finisher in the local Kaiser Roll 10k. He suffered a heart attack during his training for his transcontinental run, and then perhaps he had another one during his travels (the doctors could never confirm it). He describes every “marathon” he ran as being extremely painful, and no wonder: on day 65 of his endeavor he learns that he had been running with stress fractures in both ankles and in one kneecap. Less than a quarter through his run, his entire support crew quit and headed home, leaving just his eldest teenaged son to be his roadie. In a blunt confession towards the end of the film, Terry says us that he had no good days running, what he had were “good moments,” and that he thought about quitting every single day he was out there. How and why he persisted is explained to the viewers like this: he was driven, he met people along the way who were touched by his cause, and he had a great love for his children.
For the most part, this movie is not actually about running, nor is it actually for runners. Films like The Spirit of the Marathon, Chariots of Fire, Prefontaine, or Run For Your Life are much more inspirational and satisfying for us. While Terry’s run is indisputably a stunning physical feat, I wouldn’t call him a “runner” (the film doesn’t tell us if he kept up the activity after his southbound bipedal passage). There weren’t any real training tips to glean, he ate 6000+ calories a day (which sounds high to me, even for 30 miles a day) but drank no water, ran wearing knee braces and a breathing strip, and in one scene we see him stretching but he was doing it wrong. To me, the documentary dragged when it spent too much time on the grief and challenges the family went through when Hitchcock’s wife died, and on the logistical and motivational challenges that faced him and his crew during the run (the subject of the ultra runner’s support crew is treated in a much more thorough, interesting fashion in Running on the Sun).
For me, there were two takeaways in this film which made it worth the 90 minutes and $15. While I maintain that I see no reason to ever run further than 26.2 miles, I still would like to understand why other people see the reason to do so. Terry spoke about the mental challenge of getting out there, day after day, grinding through 27-plus painful miles, and he offered this elegant way to understand how our minds adapt to the distance and pull us through: Consider the run as the answer to a question. Q: why am I out here on Day 50, running 30 miles again? A: the run. In other words, you question the run, so you go out and run to think of your answer; therefore, the run is the answer. It’s a beautiful way to approach the long run, creating a Möbius strip for our minds to slip along as we travel 20, 25 or 30 miles.
The other takeaway was the notion of reflection and faith, and how those practices sustained him. He was still having Ah-ha Moments, still learning things about himself and human nature on his 39th run (he’d already gone nearly 1200 miles), and enjoying flashes of grace–being paced by a black bear for a few hundred yards, jogging safely through the most dangerous neighborhood of St. Louis, and wisely asking President Clinton why there wasn’t a Secretary of Children in his Cabinet.
As his son said at the end of the film, being a child with a dead mother and a hapless dad doesn’t seclude or alienate you, but it does make you who you are. Terry and his children were forged once by a death, then were forged again by a great run. I believe that, if you’re doing it right, whether you run 75 marathons in 75 days or one marathon in 75 years, running makes you who you are. So perhaps in that context, Terry Hitchcock is one amazing runner.
I am hoping to have time to write a review of this movie today today. I have to say, I think it was poorly marketed. It was not a running movie. It was a movie about doing the impossible. I hear so often, “I can’t” but this old, broken down Santa Claus of a man proved that you can. He proved that the impossible can be made possible if you have the will to push through.
Anne, yes! That is really all I wanted to say in my review, but my critique got carried away by my by descriptions. Thank you for being mu nutshell.
but drank no water
…wait…WHAT??
That’s unbelievable. Ridiculous. Dangerous!
He drank a concoction of stuff that his teenaged son mixed for him daily. He never said what the concoction was made of and I really want to find out.
Stress fractures in both ankles and one kneecap, plus a possible heart attack! Talk about MEDITATIONS FROM THE BREAKDOWN LANE, Terry Hitchcock apparently became the breakdown lane. Certainly this trek took unbelievable courage and fortitude, but I find it pretty much impossible to relate to the self-immolation. A moral shortcoming on my part, I guess, but there you have it. I do wonder, though: Did Terry accomplish what he set out to do–raise awareness regarding single parents? At the very least, it sounds as if he drew closer to his children through this ordeal, and thank goodness for that.
Yeah, I was totally thinking about Meditations from the Breakdown Lane while I was watching My Run.
Terry admits that he did not start the kind of sweeping, national interest in his cause that he had been hoping for, but he consoled himself with the small ways he connected with people, and the small ways he got his message across. But, if I was the marketing director for that campaign, I would have been disappointed in the results, which paled in comparison to Terry’s efforts running.
I think part of that had to do with the fact that his cause isn’t really that compelling. I feel bad saying that because I have friends & family who are single parents and I see their struggles, but it’s pretty common and not really something that people get ostracized over these days.
Hi TK,
I am glad we had a brief exchange over Twitter prior to the premiere of the film – that put a tickler in my head to come back and read your blog.
As I told Chris Russell in a follow up email, I must admit I am not objective because I was part of the volunteer promotional team for the film. I had not seen the film at the time I volunteered.
I admire Terry greatly for accomplishing this (and surviving to tell the tale.) He did say in the post-film interview that was aired, that he doesn’t run “much” anymore – maybe a bit of treadmill or a couple of miles here and there. I thought the best takeaways for runners were in that post-film interview, and I agree that the best takeaways had to do with the mental challenges all runners face.
I think many runners who watched the film may have been disappointed — from the standpoint that they wanted more straight running content and less feel good. Something that the marketing team could possibly have anticipated – if you call it MY RUN you’re going to get people who possibly want to hear about v02 max and cadence and that kind of stuff!
That said, I can tell you from my personal interactions with the director, the producer, and the team in charge that these people have true heart for the mission they created in deciding to create and promote MY RUN. I suppose everyone has to make money off of their product but they were phenomenal to work with – they made me feel like an equal member of the team as opposed to a back of the pack volunteer from a relatively small city in north Florida.
Best of luck with your running – I am a huge huge NYC fan (got married on the Brooklyn promenade) and would just love an opportunity to run through the City again.
Here’s the blog I wrote in advance of MY RUN that explains a bit of why I was on the team:
http://waytenmom.blogspot.com/2011/03/unstoppability-my-run-ticket-giveaway.html
I would also encourage you and everyone to share your opinion on the film’s imdb page: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1041659/
Thanks again for your candor and for this blog post!
See you on Twitter (I am @biggreenpen).
Paula
Paula thank you so much for your extensive comments. I can completely understand the power of being associated with a case and a team, and how it makes an event more meaningful. I feel that way about the fundraising work I do with Team Fox Young Professionals.
My friends and I did not stay for the post-film Q&A. By that time we had had enough and didn’t really want to hear any more about his cause or his grief. Is there somewhere else I can see the post-film Q&A–are those clips available online?
I’ll find out about the q&a!
pk
Hi TK,
The production team said the the Q&A may be placed on the website or held for an “extras” section of the DVD. So I suppose the short answer for now is “I don’t know.”
Hmm, I’d actually be MORE interested in watching it if it’s about the mental struggle and the push to do the impossible than if it’s about running. Sure, I’m a runner, but I find it more compelling to see how running relates to other parts of life – and the idea of conquering the impossible is a strong theme that really resonates with me.
I may try to check this out…